Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniil Medvedev vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Medvedev vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniil Medvedev vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Medvedev 4 - 0 Zandschulp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Medvedev has won 49.12% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 47.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Medvedev, in recent form, has won 53.5% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 49.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.23% and 30.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Medvedev has saved 59.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 58.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Medvedev has won 72.6% of matches played (W/L 53/ 20), with Zandschulp winning 47.27% (W/L 26/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Medvedev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 237/ 74), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 85/ 47). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Medvedev has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 18/ 9), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Medvedev winning 4 times and Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Medvedev winning 10 and Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Medvedev and Zandschulp was at the ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament - Rotterdam, 16-02-2023, Second, I.hard with Daniil Medvedev getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Medvedev and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Medvedev winning 0 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Medvedev winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Medvedev has played against opponents with an average rank of 92.93 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 174.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Medvedev has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Medvedev has converted 45.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 38.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
5
Rank
1
High
28
Age
R
Plays
4
Total0
3
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
102
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
72% (515-205)
Career Total W/L
63% (332-198)
76% (26-8)
YTD W/L
41% (12-17)
$29,340,920
Career Prize Money
$2,900,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Medvedev VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Daniil Medvedev | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 10 | 1 |
| Games Won | 66 | 37 |
| Aces (Total) | 36 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 13 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:43 | 1:49:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (202/309) | 62% (210/340) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (162/202) | 62% (130/210) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (58/107) | 48% (63/130) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (18/48) | 18% (3/17) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (147/340) | 29% (89/309) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Medvedev VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
11
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
10
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
76 of
114)
13
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
54 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
26%
(
26 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
114)
121
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniil Medvedev | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 76% (26/8) | 41% (12/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (64/29) | 41% (27/39) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (495/406) | 47% (302/344) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 82% (18/4) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 47% (7/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 186 | 124 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 134 | 90 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:9 | 1:47:3 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 102.03 | 185.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1748/2833) | 63% (1275/2038) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1264/1748) | 68% (869/1275) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (533/1085) | 47% (360/763) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (129/285) | 38% (70/183) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1177/2906) | 38% (781/2053) |
| Slam W/L | 82% (9/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 74% (14/5) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) | 42% (5/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (18/23) | 46% (12/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 89% (8/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 85% (11/13) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 89% (8/9) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (21/20) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (21/1) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 54% (13/7) | 6% (17/1) |
Daniil Medvedev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Tomas Machac
62%
(
93 of
149)
1st Serve %
63%
(
86 of
136)
14
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
2
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
52 of
86)
50%
(
28 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
40%
(
60 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
55 of
136)
144
Total Points Won
141
|
7-6(4) 7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Daniil Medvedev
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
1-6 0-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Dominik Koepfer
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
88 of
135)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
88)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
63 of
135)
134
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
4 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
32
Total Points Won
25
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Alexander Bublik
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Sebastian Korda
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
7
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
32%
(
37 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
114
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
97
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Medvedev Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniil Medvedev
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
